alchi-tables

Please DO NOT read this from A to Z

This is intended as a translation table between many different namespaces, so this has no beginning, and no end

Some of my favorite namespaces:

• health type (wholistic: body + mind)
• flow profile (wholistic: body + mind)
• Attachment theory (children)
• Carol Tuttle (children)
• learning styles (children)
• Helen Fisher (hormones) (relations)
• Elliot Abravanel (hormones)
• Deloitte Business Chemistry
• DISC
• Parenting style
• Carl Jung (classic)
• David Keirsey
• MBTI
• 16personalities
• William Sheldon
• diet: macronutrient ratios
• Zodiac signs
• Big Five
• work style
• Ezekiel's vision
• Satanic Bible
• Islam Sufism
• Arch Angels
• The Big Bang Theory (TV series)
• Beavis and Butthead (TV series)
• Family Guy (TV series)
• American Dad (TV series)
• South Park (TV series)
• Simpsons (TV series)

Ideally, you already know one of these namespaces, then you can try to find (Ctrl-F) the section by some keywords

Example keywords:

• Carl Jung
• MBTI
• True Colors
• Parenting style
• Attachment theory
• endomorph
• Politics
• Liberal
• Conservative
• Hans Eysenck
• David Keirsey
• Friedrich Nietzsche
• ...

... or you can scroll to a random position and start from there

alchi-maps, the mental chemistry maps
for humans and their relations

who is my self? and who are my friends?

i am looking for my self and my friends
and this is my plan ....

we can put all humans into one of sixteen boxes.
these sixteen boxes are:

yes, this is different from the sixteen types of MBTI,
cos MBTI is blind for age and gender.

a letter shows the two "outer values" of age and gender.
age = S or L = young or old.
gender = F or M = female or male.

we propose an exact definition of "nature and nurture". nature translates to body type = element. nurture translates to the six friends of each body, and the three different bond types [three modalities] between one body and its six friends.

collisions of namespaces: different authors can have different definitions for the same words. for example the contrast between "abstract" and "concrete", where we have different definitions from a. carl jung (four cognitive functions, 34 abstract + 12 concrete), and b. david kolb (four learning styles, 14 abstract + 23 concrete). or take the contrast "extravert" and "introvert", where we have different definitions from a. myers-briggs (mbti: 23 extravert + 14 introvert) and b. hans eysenck (13 extravert + 24 introvert).

element or property? it is hard to differentiate between elements (pure types) and properties (mixed types). generally, there are two solutions: 1. mental gender is ternary 2. mental gender is binary 1. one element is masculine (fire), one element is feminine (earth), two elements are bisexual (air + water). 2. two elements are masculine (fire + water), two elements are feminine (air + earth). here we prefer the second solution (mental gender is binary), so that "masculine" is a property, not a type. for example, see the William Herrmann, HBDI, Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument: surveys show that "quadrant A ~ male gender", and that "quadrat C ~ female gender". we assume that males prefer their masculine subtypes (x14), so in total, they appear extremely masculine = psychotic = quadrant A. ... and that females prefer their feminine subtypes (x23), so in total, they appear extremely feminine = neurotic = quadrant C. = more property than element = between two elements = properties are confused with elements, cos education to only one subtype seems very common (so the four properties are used as types). the survey also shows, that quadrants B and D are not correlated to gender, so we translate the domain B—D to mental age. example 2: helen fisher, love types

a number shows the two "inner values" of sense and move.
number = inner values = element = personality = temperament = character = personal truth = type of intelligence = talent = definition of mental health = inner age and inner gender.

TODO introduce four elements

translation between inner values and outer values:

sense = inner age.
move = inner gender.

Hans Eysenck:
extravert = young inside.
introvert = old inside.
neurotic = female inside.
psychotic = male inside.

move TODO introduce

what does the map tell us?
the map shows "humans and their relations".
the map can answer the question:
what humans are "naturally close" to me?
and what humans are "naturally distant" to me?
in short, who are my friends, and who are my strangers?

the hardest question is: who is who?
more precise: who does embody what "inner values"?
the good news is: inner values can be seen or measured.
the bad news is: inner values can be hidden or ignored.

how can we see inner values?
two ways:
1. from absolute signs.
2. from relative signs.

with "absolute" we mean: isolated, alone, no relations with other humans.
with "relative" we mean: connected, bound, in relations with other humans.

what are absolute signs of inner values?
1a. the "long or broad" test.
1b. the "william sheldon" test.

what are relative signs of inner values?
"tell me who your friends are,
and i tell you, who you are."
for this way, we must know the inner values of other people,
so we can observe "closeness or distance" relative to our test person.

body type and mate choice.
we use body type to predict mate choice.

mate choice and body type.
and we use mate choice to predict body type.

our system is dualistic by design.
we do not separate psychology and sociology
into two separate sciences,
but we treat psychology and sociology
as two sides of one coin, called mental chemistry, or alchemy.

static and dynamic.
the properties gender and move are static, or absolute.
the properties age and sense are dynamic, or relative.
relative properties are "secondary" as in,
only a "reaction" to static/absolute/primary properties.
static properties tell us "who is this?"
and dynamic properties tell us
"how does he react to his static properties?"
"how does he cope with his absolute values?"
extravert sense is proud of its own move.
introvert sense is ashamed [TODO better word] of its own move.
1 = fire = extravert psychotic = smart and proud of it.
2 = earth = introvert neurotic = strong but ashamed of it.
3 = air = extravert neurotic = strong and proud of it.
4 = water = introvert psychotic = smart but ashamed of it.

two classes: vagotonic and sympatonic. [vagotonia and sympatheticotonia = parasympathetic and sympathetic (nervous system bias)]
"class" is a "secondary" value, or "virtual" property.
we get class by multiplication of move and sense.
to every value, we give the signs plus and minus.
sample:
+ = extravert sense
- = introvert sense
+ = neurotic move = "extravert" move [carl jung]
- = psychotic move = "introvert" move [carl jung]
now we multiply the signs, and we see:
fire and earth have the same product = same class,
and air and water have the same product = same class.
we call these products ....

class = diagonal in a (sense x move) square.

> what is supposed to be fascist isn't decided by logic

in the end its always humans who decide or define, so its not WHAT you believe but WHO you trust

my definition of fascism? here are some points : P

* organized in large groups (over 150 people)
* large companies
* high agreeableness (big five)
* rationalism (carl jung) (not "antirationalism")
* caring culture (CAF cultural alignment framework) (not "results culture")
* transformational leadership style (workers are naturally eager and only need "soft power" to push them to the right direction, workers need little external motivation)
* long distance relations and dependencies ("oil from africa")
* open borders (large empires)
* weak communities (anti "communism", but rarely under the explicit name of anti-communism)
* melting pot (not cultural mosaic)
* prohibition of serial murder (and compensation with mass murder every 100 years)
* pro life attitude
* collectivism (equal outcome, superficial equality, differences are hidden, caste system, compartments, "no need to know")
* weak individuals with a strong dependency on others (anti-egoist, anti-narciss)
* many weak friends and only one good friend (monism, monotheism, only one god, only one ideal partner, monogamy)
* integrationism and anti-separatism (circular paradigm)
* wet humor (humorology)
* seek compromise
* want to attract many people under a low standard (sacrifice qualitiy to gain quantity)
* want to enforce the same man-made rules on a large territory, so "their people" can travel freely (more nomadic than sedentary, born "refugees" and "migrants")
* expect that words have one universal definition, and when you ask them "what exactly do YOU mean by the word x" then they tell you to "just look it up in the dictionary" (implying that you are stupid, cos you dont know the official definition)
* hunt small criminals as scapegoats for their organized crime (white collar crimes)
* project everything bad to individuals, who then are punished, so the collective is cleansed of the "dirt"
* psychology is used to critizise individuals
* real sociology (in the sense of "critizise the majority") is sabotaged or censored
* majority vote (but how exactly are these majorities generated and manipulated? and who will count the votes?) (again, superficial liberalism to fool the stupid masses)
* overrate education (indoctrination to pacifism)
* forced pacifism, anti nature, equal outcome: the strong are made weak, and the weak are made strong (at least inside the compartments, to create homogen groups)
* underrate "natural order" (believe that all are born equal, believe that criminals and wrongthinkers can be cured by "exorcism" and re-education)
* seek a paradise in heaven, high culture, anti primitive, high tech
* fascinated by astronomy (or airplanes)
* superficial liberalism (neo-liberalism, recruiting oppressed groups for class struggle)
* hidden conservatism ("this 5000 year old prophecy says we must do this")
* shadowbanning, "the wall of silence", have critics "silenced" (or murdered) = hidden conservatism
* leaders cultivate an image of modesty and "arrogant kings deserve to die" (justum necare reges impios)
* tend to wear dresses in uniform color (upper and lower body have the same color)

....

test "long or broad" shows element = inner values:
with one hand, make a ring with thumb and ring-finger.
with this ring, encircle the wrist-joint of the other hand.
three possible answers:

every point on the map has six next-ones [peers, neighbors].
with these six, one is "naturally compatible", either with dialog bond or monolog bond.
in a dialog bond, both can switch roles between "sender" and "receiver".
in a monolog bond, one is always sender, and the other is always receiver.
pallas sign = key of seven = one self plus six next-ones.

test of "body hair" shows element.

titles:
the natural seat-order.
the holy seating order.
the healing seat order.
the alchemist his friendmap.

i have a small megalo-mania, and i hope:
my plan is valid for all people.

[TODO gültig, hilfreich: valid, effective, good, working, helpful]

element and modality.
(old name for modality was "pathos", but we prefer to re-use the name from astrology, which is modality.)
every element can play two "sides", two "play types", two "pathos types".
the element describes the center, average, balance, mutable modality in the zodiac system.
the pathos describes the exception, deviation, temporary imbalance, cardinal modality or fixed modality in the zodiac system.
who can play what?
the play type always has "diff class".
vagotonics (fire and earth) can play sympatonics (air and water).
sympatonics (air and water) can play vagotonics (fire and earth).
every element can never play his opposite element:
fire can never play earth.
earth can never play fire.
air can never play water.
water can never play air.

translation to the zodiac system.
four elements = the four signs with mutable modality.
note:
vagotonics (1 + 2) are single / singular / individual.
sympatonics (3 + 4) are multiple / plural / collective.

flusskreis und spannkreuz.
flow-loop and tens-cross.
every point is an intersection point
of one flowloop and one tenscross.
see the "pallas" sign = key of seven.
in every amploop, next ones communicate via monolog, and diagonals talk in dialog.

circular solutions versus linear solutions. circular solutions use pooling of resources: we collect a group of people into one place .... TODO

TODO fill this with some helpful text
so our users can understand our project faster
and need to spend less brain-warping
in their course of learning.